KNOWING LESS AND SEEING MORE

John 9:1-41

A sermon preached at First Presbyterian Church by Carter Lester on

March 9, 2008

 

            A few years ago, Shirl Jennings, went into surgery in an Atlanta hospital.  Shirl was a masseur at the YMCA in Atlanta and was engaged to be married.  Shirl was very nervous when he went in for his surgery – and it is easy to understand why.  Most people who go into surgery get nervous, especially when there is a wedding scheduled soon after.  But with Shirl, there were some extra reasons to be nervous – conditions that not many of us face when we are being wheeled down a hospital corridor to the operating room.

            You see, what Shirl was facing was that after the surgery – when he had his first visit with the physician in charge – there would be a television camera crew present.  Because this surgery could radically change Shirl’s life.  After being blind for nearly 50 years, Shirl was going to undergo laser surgery that the doctors believed would restore Shirl’s sight – sight that he lost at the age of 3 because of a serious case of meningitis.  The camera crew was going to be there when the doctor first took the bandages off Shirl’s eye, 24 hours after the surgery.

            Can you imagine what it would be like to hear a doctor tell you that surgery could give you the ability to see – after 50 years of blindness?

            When the doctor took the bandages off Shirl’s eyes, there was clapping, and his fiancée, Barbara, called out his name.  But when Shirl turned towards her voice, all he could see was a cascade of red – her hair.  He could not make out her face.  When he looked out the window, all he could see “were great fearful blocks,” as he later described it.  All of that light hurt his eyes.

Shirl’s ability to see did not get much better when he returned home: “I could see yet I couldn’t see,” he writes.  “Waking up in the morning I would open my eyes and quickly shut them.  It took all my will power just to get up and go to work.”

            Shirl Jennings eventually saw the world-famous neurologist, Oliver Sacks, who explained what was wrong: “Your eyes are fine,” he told Shirl.  “The problem is that…the part of your brain that processes sight doesn’t know what to do with what your eyes are taking in.”[1]  Shirl’s problem was not with his eyes, but with his brain.  And only by re-training his brain would he be able to really see. 

            John 9 tells the story of Jesus’ healing of a blind man.  Unlike Shirl, this man has been blind from birth.  And unlike Shirl, this blind man has no problem seeing after he is healed by Jesus.  But in a story that manages to be both comical and poignant, nearly everyone else other than the blind man has difficulties with seeing.  The problem is not with their eyes – but with their brains, hearts, and faith.  When it comes to Jesus’ words and actions, they are blind because they cannot process what they are seeing.

            Consider the disciples.  They see the blind man – but they really don’t see him.  What they see is not a man but a puzzle, fodder for their theological debates.  “Rabbi,” they ask Jesus, “Who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”  “Who can we blame here?” the disciples ask Jesus.

            In typical fashion, when given just two alternatives Jesus opts for a third one that no one else has thought of.  Instead of answering a general philosophical question, Jesus talks about what God wants to do in this blind man’s life: “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him.”  And then Jesus proves his point by making mud to cover the blind man’s closed eyes and sending him off to wash his eyes in a nearby pool.

            How often are we blind like the disciples?  Instead of seeing a three-dimensional person in front of us, we see one-dimensional evidence for our philosophies and political agendas.  We see a youth on a skateboard on the church parking lot and talk about “all of the unruly teens” these days.  Or, we see a foreign looking man and talk about all of the illegal immigrants flooding our country. 

How many times in the face of human suffering do we turn most our attention and energy to the question of who is to blame rather than to the question of “what does God want to happen here?”  Do we see as poorly as the disciples here in John 9?  If so, the problem is not with our eyes; the problem is how we process with our minds and hearts what our eyes are seeing.

Second, consider the healed man’s neighbors.  Every indication is that this blind man is a grown man, so that the neighbors would have watched him grow up.  They would have passed by him standing beside the road and begging for money for years and years.  They passed by him, but did not really see him.  Because after this man is healed, they are not sure who he is. 

The scene turns comical.  The crowd is arguing back and forth as to whether this healed man is the blind man who used to stand beside the road and beg.  All the while, the healed man, the man they are talking about and arguing about is standing right in front of them.  Finally, the healed man says with obvious frustration: “I AM THE MAN.”

How often are we blind like the neighbors?  How many people are there in our lives – people down the street or the janitors in our schools, people in the cubicle down the hall at work or behind the counter at the WaWa where we stop every morning – who we pass by without really noticing them?  If something changed about them – would we see it, or would we be blind to it because they are not really on our radar?

When it comes to seeing the blind man, the difference between Jesus and the neighbors is not that Jesus can see a smaller line of print on the eye chart at the doctor’s office.  No, what separates Jesus from the neighbors is how he processes in his mind and heart what his eyes see.  The difference is that Jesus does not pass by the blind man without noticing him.   Instead, he pays attention to the blind man.  Jesus sees  him.

Third, there are the Pharisees and religious leaders.  They are the most blind of them all – because they think that they have everything figured out.  First, they argue that the man could not have been born blind.  But the parents prove them wrong. 

Then, the religious leaders argue that Jesus must be a sinner because he heals on the Sabbath.  But the healed man’s simple logic shoots down this argument: “If this man were not from God, he could do nothing,” the blind man points out.  And yet, “I was blind [but] now I see.”  What do people with all of the answers do when someone points out that those answers cannot hold water?  They get angry and reject the messenger bearing an unwanted message:  “You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?” they sputter.  And then the religious leaders drive the healed man out.  Poor guy.  “[He] is excommunicated.  And he never asked to be healed in the first place!”[2]

The religious leaders know so much that they are as blind as a bat.  They know that this man was not born blind.  But they are wrong.  They know that Jesus did not really heal this blind man.  But they are wrong.  They know that Jesus is nothing special; in fact, he must be a sinner.  But they are wrong every step of the way.  They are blind.  But once again, the problem is not with their eyes.  It is with how they process what they see.

There is no one quite as blind as a religious know-it-all.  Because when you have all of the answers, there is no reason to ask the questions or learn from anyone else.  And there is no one quite as dangerous as the one who thinks they know enough to give answers for God.  Remember that the next time you hear a politician talking about God’s will, or a religious figure assessing who is to blame after a tragedy happens.  When you hear that, know that you are hearing the blind trying to lead the blind.

But blindness is not just the sin of the powerful and arrogant.  It is also our sin.  Like the religious leaders, we are blind to our own failures and shortcomings; blind to what God is doing in our life and the life of the world.

What is the answer for our blindness?  What hope do we have?

The religious leaders stumble upon the answer at the end of this passage, although it is not clear whether they comprehend the answer.  Some of the Pharisees ask Jesus a question: “Surely we are not blind are we?”  Are they open to be told, “yes, you are blind,” or are they just expecting Jesus to tell them, “No, of course not!”

It is not clear.  But Jesus’ response to their question could not be clearer:  “If you were blind, you would not have sin.  But now that you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains.”

What is our answer?  Do we claim to have all of the answers or do we acknowledge that when it comes to the marvelous presence of God, there is a lot we don’t know?  Do we acknowledge our blindness?  Because the only cure for our blindness is to acknowledge it and let Jesus heal us. 

And heal it he will, if we let him.  Because Jesus will not pass by us without stopping, any more than he passed by the blind man in John 9 without stopping.  Jesus is the Light of the World.  He has come to bring sight to the blind, every one of us.  He has come to bring light to the darkness, our darkness.

“Seeing is believing,” we often say.  Based on that logic, we think that if only God would do a miracle that all could see, then it would be easier for all to believe.  But that is not the way it works.  Look at this story here: a blind man is given his sight, but all it leads to is questions and quarrels.  There is no joy or celebration.[3]

It is not “seeing is believing.”  Instead, it is just the opposite: believing is seeing.  With belief, with faith, we can start seeing and understanding so much that is going on in life.  We can start seeing what has been present all along: God at work.

But we will not necessarily see and understand all at once.  Notice the progression that takes place here with the healed man.  At first, he doesn’t even know what Jesus looks like.  Remember: Jesus sent him to wash his eyes in the pool and then Jesus walked away before the man regained his sight.  Then the healed man considers Jesus to be only a prophet, and nothing more.  However, by the end of the story, the healed man has come to know Jesus as the Son of Man, as his Lord and Savior, and the light of the world. 

Shirl Jennings really struggled after his surgery.  And with that struggle came a faith crisis.  He thought everything would change instantly with that surgery, but in some ways it only got harder.  And, in the turmoil, he lost sight of that which had given him strength in his blindness: his faith.

He writes, “Sight has come back to me slowly.  Big things are easiest for me to process….Little details escape me.  But I’m learning to take in the world piece by piece, like putting together a puzzle.  And like a puzzle, it will take time to complete. …What really matters is I can sense God again….[God’s] in the light and the colors just as he was in the darkness.  That’s all I really need to see.”[4]

Are we ready for Jesus to touch our eyes today so that we can see who he is?  Though spiritual insight may not come to us all at once, when we are able to see Christ as Lord, as the Light of the World, we will be able to sense God’s presence and see God’s power at work – no matter how dark it is. 

And in the end, that is all we really need to see.

 

 

 

           

      



[1] Shirl Jennings, “Restored,” in Guideposts, January 2002, 52-56.

[2] Fred B. Craddock, John H. Hayes, Carl Holladay, and Gene M. Tucker, Preaching Through the Christian Year A (Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1992), 173.

[3] Craddock, 173.

[4] Jennings, 56.